Overview
| • | Oyez: Google v. Oracle |
| • | Docket: #18-956 |
References:
| • | Section 101 (copyrightability of computer software) |
| • | Section 102 (exceptions to copyrightability, specifically “method of operation”) |
| • | Section 107 (standard fair use considerations) |
| • | Section 117 (specific exceptions to software copyrightability) |
| • | Section 302 (duration of copyright) |
| • | Rule 39 (option for a jury trial) |
| • | Rule 50 (appellate review of matter of law) |
| • | Baker (merger doctrine) |
| • | Altai (lower court standards for APIs) |
| • | CONTU Report (fair use) |
| • | Harper (fair use, standard of review) |
| • | Stewart (fair use) |
| • |
| • |
| • | Seventh Amendment (relationship of courts and juries with respect to facts) |
| • | Liberty Lobby (standard of review under summary judgement, and hence rule 50) |
Google’s argument:
Oracle’s argument:
US Government’s argument:
Google’s rebuttal: